Difference between revisions of "Talk:Callbacks"
From GRFSpecs
Jump to navigationJump to search (Discussion started for "callbacks") |
(answer) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
I'm guessing some relevant information is still missing? |
I'm guessing some relevant information is still missing? |
||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Frosch|Frosch]] ([[User talk:Frosch|talk]]) 18:06, 18 October 2013 (UTC) |
||
| + | 1C was wrong, I copied that from your example :p It's in fact 0C. |
||
| + | |||
| + | Testing callbacks with type 81 was deprecated 2005 or 2006. It should no longer be used. It only still works because new callback IDs were assigned in a way, so that old NewGRF do not break. That's the reason why there is a gap from 3E to 13F. |
||
Revision as of 18:06, 18 October 2013
--Gesia (talk) 21:48, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
The new introduction states that variable 1C is a word and therefore type 85 must be used.
However, the paragraph below mentions variable 0C and some GRFs (e.g. Ikarus 6) use type 81, which seems to work ingame:
81 * 9 02 01 02 01 01 00 00 00 00 82 * 14 02 01 10 81 0C 00 FF 01 02 FF 23 23 02 00 83 * 7 00 01 01 01 02 0E FF 84 * 10 03 01 01 02 01 FF 10 00 A1 00
I'm guessing some relevant information is still missing?
--Frosch (talk) 18:06, 18 October 2013 (UTC) 1C was wrong, I copied that from your example :p It's in fact 0C.
Testing callbacks with type 81 was deprecated 2005 or 2006. It should no longer be used. It only still works because new callback IDs were assigned in a way, so that old NewGRF do not break. That's the reason why there is a gap from 3E to 13F.
